↓ Skip to main content

Modulating the folding stability and ligand binding affinity of Pin1 WW domain by proline ring puckering

Overview of attention for article published in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Modulating the folding stability and ligand binding affinity of Pin1 WW domain by proline ring puckering
Published in
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/prot.24359
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hsu‐Cheng Tang, Yu‐Ju Lin, Jia‐Cherng Horng

Abstract

The pyrrolidine side chain makes proline play a unique role in protein structure and function. The C(γ) ring pucker preference and the cis-trans peptidyl bond ratio can be mediated via stereoelectronic effects. Here we used a compact triple-stranded antiparallel β-sheet protein, the human Pin1 WW domain, to study the consequences of implanting a preorganized C(γ) ring pucker on protein structure and function. The conserved Pro37 is a key residue involved in one hydrophobic core, plays an important role in the WW domain, and adopts a C(γ) -endo ring pucker in the native structure. Pro37 was replaced with C(γ) -exo biased pucker derivatives: (2S,4R)-4-hydroxyproline (4R-Hyp), (2S,4R)-4-fluoroproline (4R-Flp), (2S,4R)-4-methoxyproline (4R-Mop), and C(γ) -endo biased pucker derivatives: (2S,4S)-4-hydroxyproline (4S-hyp), (2S,4S)-4-fluoroproline (4S-flp), (2S,4S)-4-methoxyproline (4S-mop) to examine how a preorganized pucker affects the folding stability and ligand-binding affinity. Circular dichroism measurements indicate that among the variants, only the one with 4S-flp substitution (P37flp) is more stable than the wild type, suggesting that the stabilization effects originated from preorganization of the backbone conformation and the hydrophobicity of C - F group. Analysis of ligand-binding affinity using isothermal titration calorimetry revealed that only P37flp has a stronger ligand affinity than the wild type, showing that 4S-flp can stabilize the WW domain and increase its ligand affinity. Together we have used 4-substituted proline derivatives and the WW domain to demonstrate that proline ring puckering can be a key factor in determining the folding stability of a protein but the choice of the derivative groups is also critical.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2013.
All research outputs
#22,362,384
of 27,362,573 outputs
Outputs from Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
#2,834
of 3,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,822
of 216,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
#37
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,362,573 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.