↓ Skip to main content

First Contact Physiotherapy: An evaluation of clinical effectiveness and costs

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
First Contact Physiotherapy: An evaluation of clinical effectiveness and costs
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, March 2024
DOI 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0560
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Walsh, Serena Halls, Rachel Thomas, Alice Berry, Cathy Liddiard, Margaret Elizabeth Cupples, Heather Gage, Dan Jackson, Fiona Cramp, Hannah Stott, Paula Kersten, Justin Jagosh, Dave Foster, Peter Williams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 11 92%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 11 92%
Psychology 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,922,485
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#935
of 4,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,109
of 329,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#6
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.