You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Kidney damage associated with COVID-19: from the acute to the chronic phase
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Renal Failure, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/0886022x.2024.2316885 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yannick Nlandu, Elliot Koranteng Tannor, Titilope Bafemika, Jean-Robert Makulo |
| Abstract |
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) infection is well established as a systemic disease including kidney damage. The entry point into the renal cell remains the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor and the spectrum of renal lesions is broad, with a clear predominance of structural and functional tubular lesions. The most common form of glomerular injury is collapsing glomerulopathy (CG), which is strongly associated with apolipoprotein L1(APOL-1) risk variants. These acute lesions, which are secondary to the direct or indirect effects of SARS-CoV-2, can progress to chronicity and are specific to long COVID-19 in the absence of any other cause. Residual inflammation associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, in addition to acute kidney injury (AKI) as a transitional state with or without severe histological lesions, may be responsible for greater kidney function decline in mild-to-moderate COVID-19. This review discusses the evidence for renal histological markers of chronicity in COVID-19 patients and triggers of low-grade inflammation that may explain the decline in kidney function in the post-COVID-19 period. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 231 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 10% |
| Spain | 18 | 8% |
| Canada | 8 | 3% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| France | 8 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 125 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 202 | 87% |
| Scientists | 14 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#424,428
of 25,974,666 outputs
Outputs from Renal Failure
#7
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,130
of 326,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Renal Failure
#1
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,974,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.