You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reconstructing Late Neolithic animal management practices at Kangjia, North China, using microfossil analysis of dental calculus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Antiquity, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.15184/aqy.2024.43 |
| Authors |
Jiajing Wang, Li Liu, Xiaoli Qin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 98% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,266,881
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Antiquity
#509
of 3,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,258
of 249,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antiquity
#12
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.