You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative assessment of eDNA metabarcoding and longline deployments for elasmobranch surveying across a large tropical marine park network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aquatic Conservation, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/aqc.4144 |
| Authors |
Katrina M. West, Alastair V. Harry, Sam Payet, Euan Harvey, Dambimangari Rangers, Bardi‐Jawi Rangers, Karajarri Rangers, Yawuru Country Managers, Michael J. Travers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 26% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 60% |
| Scientists | 13 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,914,409
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Conservation
#200
of 1,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,539
of 262,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Conservation
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.