You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cutaneous Stigmata of Bacterial Endocarditis
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Dermatology, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0481 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matteo Castrichini, Robert J. Haemmerle, Pritish K. Tosh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 5 | 10% |
Spain | 4 | 8% |
United States | 4 | 8% |
Peru | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
China | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 30 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 40 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
Scientists | 3 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,316,286
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Dermatology
#951
of 6,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,576
of 161,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Dermatology
#17
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.