↓ Skip to main content

Horse populations are severely underestimated in a region at risk of Hendra virus spillover.

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Veterinary Journal, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Horse populations are severely underestimated in a region at risk of Hendra virus spillover.
Published in
Australian Veterinary Journal, April 2024
DOI 10.1111/avj.13331
Pubmed ID
Authors

B Linnegar, D H Kerlin, P Eby, P Kemsley, H McCallum, A J Peel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,607,371
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Australian Veterinary Journal
#85
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,734
of 224,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Veterinary Journal
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.