You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Phantoms in and of the Archive: Mary Cudmore’s Encounters with a Ghost in Cork in 1688 and 1689
|
---|---|
Published in |
Historical Journal, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x24000128 |
Authors |
Clodagh Tait |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 13 | 24% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 16% |
United States | 3 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 28 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 16% |
Scientists | 8 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,052,849
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Historical Journal
#44
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,211
of 206,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Journal
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.