↓ Skip to main content

Don Juan Basin, Antarctica: A chemically altering environment with martian analog potential

Overview of attention for article published in American Mineralogist, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Don Juan Basin, Antarctica: A chemically altering environment with martian analog potential
Published in
American Mineralogist, March 2024
DOI 10.2138/am-2022-8779
Authors

Andrew B. Foerder, Peter A.J. Englert, Janice L. Bishop, Christian Koeberl, Zachary F.M. Burton, Shital Patel, Everett K. Gibson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,885,387
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from American Mineralogist
#724
of 1,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,407
of 205,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Mineralogist
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.