You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deep learning workflow to support in-flight processing of digital aerial imagery for wildlife population surveys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0288121 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tsung-Wei Ke, Stella X. Yu, Mark D. Koneff, David L. Fronczak, Luke J. Fara, Travis J. Harrison, Kyle L. Landolt, Enrika J. Hlavacek, Brian R. Lubinski, Timothy P. White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#23,006,723
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#202,836
of 223,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,024
of 167,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,002
of 3,102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.