You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Food systems interventions for nutrition: lessons from six program evaluations in Africa and South Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nutrition, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.04.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynnette M Neufeld, Stella Nordhagen, Jef L Leroy, Noora-Lisa Aberman, Inka Barnett, Eric Djimeu Wouabe, Amy Webb Girard, Wendy Gonzalez, Carol E Levin, Mduduzi Nn Mbuya, Eduardo Nakasone, Christina Nyhus Dhillon, Dave Prescott, Matt Smith, David Tschirley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 10% |
| United States | 8 | 9% |
| Kenya | 6 | 7% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 4 | 4% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| Uganda | 3 | 3% |
| Philippines | 3 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 70% |
| Scientists | 13 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#702,376
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition
#631
of 9,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,316
of 270,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition
#1
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.