You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Steroid versus placebo injections and wrist splints in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1177/17531934241240380 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ebubechi Adindu, Sina Ramtin, Ali Azarpey, David Ring, Teun Teunis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 57% |
Japan | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,868,860
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
#157
of 1,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,972
of 212,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,711 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them