↓ Skip to main content

A review of studies on seated whole body vibration and low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A review of studies on seated whole body vibration and low back pain
Published in
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, June 1999
DOI 10.1243/0954411991535040
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The paper reviews the epidemiologic evidence linking low back pain (LBP) and exposure to whole body vibration (WBV). Particular emphasis is placed on studies where the exposure is quantified. Biomechanical studies show a resonance at 4-5 Hz. At the resonance the transmissibility exceeds 1.0, and is dependent on seat attenuation, posture and seat back inclination. Increased spinal loading is evidenced by increased muscle activity, muscle fatigue, and disc pressure, and by decreased stature. Physiologic changes also occur with WBV. The risk of LBP can be reduced by vibration damping, good ergonomic design, reducing exposure, and reducing other risks such as lifting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Student > Master 14 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 28 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Sports and Recreations 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,087,098
of 27,786,078 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
#61
of 849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,732
of 40,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,786,078 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 849 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them