↓ Skip to main content

Modelling antecedent soil hydrological conditions to improve the prediction of landslide susceptibility in typhoon-prone regions

Overview of attention for article published in Landslides, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modelling antecedent soil hydrological conditions to improve the prediction of landslide susceptibility in typhoon-prone regions
Published in
Landslides, April 2024
DOI 10.1007/s10346-024-02242-8
Authors

Clàudia Abancó, Flavio Alexander Asurza, Vicente Medina, Marcel Hürlimann, Georgina L. Bennett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,016,629
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#210
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,401
of 160,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.