| Title |
2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Europace, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1093/europace/euae043 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stylianos Tzeis, Edward P Gerstenfeld, Jonathan Kalman, Eduardo B Saad, Alireza Sepehri Shamloo, Jason G Andrade, Chirag R Barbhaiya, Tina Baykaner, Serge Boveda, Hugh Calkins, Ngai-Yin Chan, Minglong Chen, Shih-Ann Chen, Nikolaos Dagres, Ralph J Damiano, Tom De Potter, Isabel Deisenhofer, Nicolas Derval, Luigi Di Biase, Mattias Duytschaever, Katia Dyrda, Gerhard Hindricks, Meleze Hocini, Young-Hoon Kim, Mark la Meir, Jose Luis Merino, Gregory F Michaud, Andrea Natale, Isabelle Nault, Santiago Nava, Takashi Nitta, Mark O'Neill, Hui-Nam Pak, Jonathan P Piccini, Helmut Pürerfellner, Tobias Reichlin, Luis Carlos Saenz, Prashanthan Sanders, Richard Schilling, Boris Schmidt, Gregory E Supple, Kevin L Thomas, Claudio Tondo, Atul Verma, Elaine Y Wan, Daniel Steven, Michael-Joseph Agbayani, T Jared Bunch, Aman Chugh, Juan Carlos Díaz, James V Freeman, Carina Abigail Hardy, Hein Heidbuchel, Sofian Johar, Dominik Linz, Bart Maesen, Peter A Noseworthy, Seil Oh, Andreu Porta-Sanchez, Tatjana Potpara, Gerardo Rodriguez-Diez, Frederic Sacher, Piotr Suwalski, Serge A Trines |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 388 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 34 | 9% |
| United States | 25 | 6% |
| Spain | 21 | 5% |
| Colombia | 15 | 4% |
| Argentina | 12 | 3% |
| Germany | 11 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 11 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 3% |
| Japan | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 88 | 23% |
| Unknown | 152 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 289 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 50 | 13% |
| Scientists | 37 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 17 | 31% |
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 41% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 565. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#43,468
of 25,967,806 outputs
Outputs from Europace
#3
of 3,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#585
of 313,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Europace
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,967,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.