↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting the genesis of the adakite-like granitoids in collisional zones: Water-fluxed melting of intermediate to felsic rocks with dilution by low Sr/Y phases

Overview of attention for article published in American Mineralogist, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Revisiting the genesis of the adakite-like granitoids in collisional zones: Water-fluxed melting of intermediate to felsic rocks with dilution by low Sr/Y phases
Published in
American Mineralogist, March 2024
DOI 10.2138/am-2022-8873
Authors

Yuan-Hui Xie, Joshua J. Schwartz, Xiao-Wei Li, Keda Cai, Bader Thomas, Huan Li, Fang-Yue Wang, Xiao-Bing Zhang, Xuan-Xue Mo, Guo-Chen Dong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,496,858
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from American Mineralogist
#734
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,368
of 202,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Mineralogist
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.