↓ Skip to main content

Health insurer monopsony power: the all-or-none model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Economics, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Health insurer monopsony power: the all-or-none model
Published in
Journal of Health Economics, March 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00117-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The textbook model of monopsony that is typically employed in analyzing health insurer monopsony power does not adequately describe the supply decision of physicians confronting a dominant health insurer. Rather than restricting purchases in order to extract a lower price for provider services, monopsonistic insurers are able to obtain discounts from providers without experiencing a decrease in quantity when physicians are forced to operate along their "all-or-none" supply curve. The welfare effects of the all-or-none model of monopsony are compared to those implied by the traditional model.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Colombia 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2011.
All research outputs
#12,373,133
of 34,452,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Economics
#1,787
of 2,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,307
of 70,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Economics
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,452,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.