You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early Aboriginal pottery production and offshore island occupation on Jiigurru (Lizard Island group), Great Barrier Reef, Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108624 |
| Authors |
Sean Ulm, Ian J. McNiven, Glenn R. Summerhayes, Pei-hua Wu, Magdalena M.E. Bunbury, Fiona Petchey, Quan Hua, Robert Skelly, Ariana B.J. Lambrides, Cassandra Rowe, Kelsey M. Lowe, Christian H. Reepmeyer, Cailey Maclaurin, Katherine G.P. Woo, Matthew Harris, Sarah B. Morgan, Kayla L. Turner-Kose, Sarah A. Slater, Joshua D. Connelly, Michael C. Kneppers, Katherine Szabó, Andrew Fairbairn, Simon G. Haberle, Felicitas Hopf, Robert Bultitude, Jeremy Ash, Stephen E. Lewis, Robin J. Beaman, Javier Xavier Leon, Matthew C. McDowell, Martin Potter, Benjamin Connelly, Chris Little, Scott Jackson, John McCarthy, Luke D. Nothdurft, Jian-xin Zhao, Michael I. Bird, Matthew W. Felgate, Brian Cobus, Walmbaar Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 25% |
| United States | 7 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 75% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 19% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2026.
All research outputs
#191,974
of 34,250,479 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#37
of 4,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,659
of 362,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#2
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,250,479 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.