↓ Skip to main content

Advancing Science Through Collaborative Data Sharing and Synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives on Psychological Science, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Advancing Science Through Collaborative Data Sharing and Synthesis
Published in
Perspectives on Psychological Science, July 2013
DOI 10.1177/1745691613491579
Pubmed ID
Authors

NIMH Collaborative Data Synthesis for Adolescent Depression Trials Study Team including:, Tatiana Perrino, George Howe, Anne Sperling, William Beardslee, Irwin Sandler, David Shern, Hilda Pantin, Sheila Kaupert, Nicole Cano, Gracelyn Cruden, Frank Bandiera, C. Hendricks Brown

Abstract

The demand for researchers to share their data has increased dramatically in recent years. There is a need to replicate and confirm scientific findings to bolster confidence in many research areas. Data sharing also serves the critical function of allowing synthesis of findings across trials. As innovative statistical methods have helped resolve barriers to synthesis analyses, data sharing and synthesis can help answer research questions that cannot be answered by individual trials alone. However, the sharing of data among researchers remains challenging and infrequent. This article aims to (a) increase support for data sharing and synthesis collaborations among researchers to advance scientific knowledge and (b) provide a model for establishing these collaborations using the example of the ongoing National Institute of Mental Health's Collaborative Data Synthesis on Adolescent Depression Trials. This study brings together datasets from existing prevention and treatment trials in adolescent depression, as well as researchers and stakeholders, to answer questions about "for whom interventions work" and "by what pathways interventions have their effects." This is critical to improving interventions, including increasing knowledge about intervention efficacy among minority populations, or what we call "scientific equity." The collaborative model described is relevant to fields with research questions that can only be addressed by synthesizing individual-level data.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Singapore 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 114 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 21%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Professor 8 6%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 33 27%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 23%
Social Sciences 20 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Computer Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,513,811
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives on Psychological Science
#870
of 1,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,671
of 237,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives on Psychological Science
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.