↓ Skip to main content

Inclusion in Postsecondary Institutions With Small Numbers of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students: Highlights and Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inclusion in Postsecondary Institutions With Small Numbers of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students: Highlights and Challenges
Published in
Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, July 2013
DOI 10.1093/deafed/ent035
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper provides an examination of how small populations of deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) students attending New Zealand postsecondary institutions faced and dealt with various challenges in participating in classes, obtaining adequate access to services, and becoming socially integrated into campus life. Sixty-four students completed a survey and 8 were interviewed, providing information about their support needs, learning, and social participation experiences and challenges within the postsecondary context. Findings indicated that access to accommodations that facilitated communication and inclusion were critically important to their learning and participation experiences but were not always available in the institutions they attended. Reflecting recent policy and legislative changes, greater awareness and greater funding support are needed within New Zealand postsecondary institutions of DHH students' academic and social needs. This process should be at the forefront of moves toward inclusive education at the postsecondary level, if DHH students are to be equal participants.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 107 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 12%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 28%
Psychology 13 12%
Linguistics 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 36 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2013.
All research outputs
#30,743,424
of 33,937,515 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education
#711
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,325
of 237,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,937,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.