↓ Skip to main content

New Models of Self-Management Education for Minority Ethnic Groups: Pilot Randomized Trial of a Story-Sharing Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
New Models of Self-Management Education for Minority Ethnic Groups: Pilot Randomized Trial of a Story-Sharing Intervention
Published in
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, January 2011
DOI 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.009159
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

no model of self-management education or peer support has yet achieved widespread reach and acceptability with minority ethnic groups. We sought to refine and test a new complex intervention in diabetes education: informal story-sharing groups facilitated by bilingual health advocates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 163 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 19%
Student > Master 25 15%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Social Sciences 22 13%
Psychology 14 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 49 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,528,172
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
#334
of 876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,952
of 249,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them