↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support in Specialized Situations

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support in Specialized Situations
Published in
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, June 2013
DOI 10.1097/pcc.0b013e318292e16e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this review was to provide a systematic review of the literature regarding the use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in various specialized conditions, as part of the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society/Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Joint Statement on Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 84 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 22 25%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,266,816
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#1,043
of 4,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,066
of 240,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#8
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.