↓ Skip to main content

Walking in Hypoxia: An Efficient Treatment to Lessen Mechanical Constraints and Improve Health in Obese Individuals?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Walking in Hypoxia: An Efficient Treatment to Lessen Mechanical Constraints and Improve Health in Obese Individuals?
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2017.00073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Lecturer 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 29 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 23 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 32 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,451,933
of 32,810,023 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,890
of 17,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,665
of 457,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#38
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,810,023 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.