↓ Skip to main content

Creating riverine wetlands: Ecological succession, nutrient retention, and pulsing effects

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Engineering, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Creating riverine wetlands: Ecological succession, nutrient retention, and pulsing effects
Published in
Ecological Engineering, December 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.04.014
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
South Africa 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 301 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 21%
Researcher 67 20%
Student > Master 50 15%
Other 21 6%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 62 19%
Unknown 42 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 131 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 8%
Engineering 10 3%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 61 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2024.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Engineering
#580
of 1,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,410
of 172,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Engineering
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.