You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interstitial macrophages are a focus of viral takeover and inflammation in COVID-19 initiation in human lung
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1084/jem.20232192 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy Ting-Hsuan Wu, Kyle J. Travaglini, Arjun Rustagi, Duo Xu, Yue Zhang, Leonid Andronov, SoRi Jang, Astrid Gillich, Roozbeh Dehghannasiri, Giovanny J. Martínez-Colón, Aimee Beck, Daniel Dan Liu, Aaron J. Wilk, Maurizio Morri, Winston L. Trope, Rob Bierman, Irving L. Weissman, Joseph B. Shrager, Stephen R. Quake, Christin S. Kuo, Julia Salzman, W.E. Moerner, Peter S. Kim, Catherine A. Blish, Mark A. Krasnow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 577 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 7% |
| France | 39 | 7% |
| Germany | 21 | 4% |
| Spain | 19 | 3% |
| Japan | 16 | 3% |
| Canada | 13 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 2% |
| Mexico | 7 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 49 | 8% |
| Unknown | 357 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 526 | 91% |
| Scientists | 34 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 394. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#78,855
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#33
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#690
of 224,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.