↓ Skip to main content

The epidemiology of placenta previa in the United States, 1979 through 1987

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, May 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The epidemiology of placenta previa in the United States, 1979 through 1987
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, May 1993
DOI 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90776-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Placenta previa can cause serious, occasionally fatal complications for fetuses and mothers; however, data on its national incidence and sociodemographic risk factors have not been available. We analyzed data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey for the years 1979 through 1987 and from the Retrospective Maternal Mortality Study (1979 through 1986). We found that placenta previa complicated 4.8 per 1000 deliveries annually and was fatal in 0.03% of cases. Incidence rates remained stable among white women but increased among black and other minority women (p < 0.1). In addition, the risk of placenta previa was higher for black and other minority women than for white women (rate ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 1.7), and it was higher for women > or = 35 years old than for women <20 years old (rate ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval 3.3 to 7.0). Women with placenta previa were at an increased risk of abruptio placentae (rate ratio 13.8), cesarean delivery (rate ratio 3.9), fetal malpresentation (rate ratio 2.8), and postpartum hemorrhage (rate ratio 1.7). Our findings support the need for improved prenatal and intrapartum care to reduce the serious complications and deaths associated with placenta previa.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 17 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#12,343,970
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#9,448
of 17,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,345
of 29,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#30
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.