You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phosphoproteomic analysis of the adaption of epididymal epithelial cells to corticosterone challenge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Andrology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/andr.13636 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A. Skerrett‐Byrne, Simone J. Stanger, Natalie A. Trigg, Amanda L. Anderson, Petra Sipilä, Ilana R. Bernstein, Tessa Lord, John E. Schjenken, Heather C. Murray, Nicole M. Verrills, Matthew D. Dun, Terence Y. Pang, Brett Nixon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,334,658
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Andrology
#536
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,298
of 234,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Andrology
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.