You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Free-for-all: Does crowding impact outcomes because hospital emergency departments do not prioritise effectively?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Health Economics, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102881 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Igor Francetic, Rachel Meacock, Matt Sutton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 54% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 62% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,631,317
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Economics
#399
of 2,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,548
of 218,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Economics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them