↓ Skip to main content

An Open-Source R Package for Detection of Adverse Events Under-Reporting in Clinical Trials: Implementation and Validation by the IMPALA (Inter coMPany quALity Analytics) Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Open-Source R Package for Detection of Adverse Events Under-Reporting in Clinical Trials: Implementation and Validation by the IMPALA (Inter coMPany quALity Analytics) Consortium
Published in
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, April 2024
DOI 10.1007/s43441-024-00631-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Björn Koneswarakantha, Ronojit Adyanthaya, Jennifer Emerson, Frederik Collin, Annett Keller, Michaela Mattheus, Ioannis Spyroglou, Sandra Donevska, Timothé Ménard

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,873,876
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
#101
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,781
of 186,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them