↓ Skip to main content

Identifying relations between imaging phenotypes and molecular subtypes of breast cancer: Model discovery and external validation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identifying relations between imaging phenotypes and molecular subtypes of breast cancer: Model discovery and external validation
Published in
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, February 2017
DOI 10.1002/jmri.25661
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine whether dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) characteristics of the breast tumor and background parenchyma can distinguish molecular subtypes (ie, luminal A/B or basal) of breast cancer. In all, 84 patients from one institution and 126 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used for discovery and external validation, respectively. Thirty-five quantitative image features were extracted from DCE-MRI (1.5 or 3T) including morphology, texture, and volumetric features, which capture both tumor and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) characteristics. Multiple testing was corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg method to control the false-discovery rate (FDR). Sparse logistic regression models were built using the discovery cohort to distinguish each of the three studied molecular subtypes versus the rest, and the models were evaluated in the validation cohort. On univariate analysis in discovery and validation cohorts, two features characterizing tumor and two characterizing BPE were statistically significant in separating luminal A versus nonluminal A cancers; two features characterizing tumor were statistically significant for separating luminal B; one feature characterizing tumor and one characterizing BPE reached statistical significance for distinguishing basal (Wilcoxon P < 0.05, FDR < 0.25). In discovery and validation cohorts, multivariate logistic regression models achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.71 and 0.73 for luminal A cancer, 0.67 and 0.69 for luminal B cancer, and 0.66 and 0.79 for basal cancer, respectively. DCE-MRI characteristics of breast cancer and BPE may potentially be used to distinguish among molecular subtypes of breast cancer. 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 30%
Engineering 10 13%
Computer Science 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,000,155
of 24,578,676 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#2,836
of 3,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,558
of 429,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#33
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,578,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.