↓ Skip to main content

Automated Algorithm for GI Spike Burst Detection and Demonstration of Efficacy in Ischemic Small Intestine

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Automated Algorithm for GI Spike Burst Detection and Demonstration of Efficacy in Ischemic Small Intestine
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10439-013-0812-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We present a novel, fully-automated gastrointestinal spike burst detection algorithm. Following pre-processing with SALPA (Wagenaar and Potter, J. Neurosci. Methods 120:113-120, 2002) and a Savitzky-Golay filter to remove unwanted low and high frequency components, candidate spike waveforms are detected utilizing the non-linear energy operator. Candidate waveforms are classified as spikes or artifact by a support vector machine. The new method achieves highly satisfactory performance with >90% sensitivity and positive prediction value. We also demonstrate an application of the new method to detect changes in spike rate and spatial propagation patterns upon induction of mesenteric ischemia in the small intestine. Spike rates were observed to transiently increase 10-20 fold for a duration of ≈600 s, relative to baseline conditions. In ischemic conditions, spike activity propagation patterns included retrograde-longitudinal wavefronts with occasional spontaneous conduction blocks, as well as self-terminating concentric-circumferential wavefronts. Longitudinal and circumferential velocities were 6.8-8.0 cm/s and 18.7 cm/s, respectively.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#23,319,379
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,901
of 207,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.