Overview of attention for article published in Conference proceedings Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, January 2011
In this study, an automated algorithm was developed to identify the arrhythmic gastric slow wave activity that was recorded using high-resolution mapping technique. The raw signals were processed with a Savitzky-Golay filter, and the slow wave activation times were identified using a threshold-varying method and grouped using a region-growing method. Slow wave amplitudes and velocities were calculated for all cycles. Arrhythmic events were identified when the orientation of a slow wave at an electrode exceeded the 95% confidence interval of the averaged orientation of several normal cycles. A second selection criterion was further developed to identify the arrhythmic events by an anisotropy ratio. In both pig and human studies, arrhythmias were associated with the emergence of circumferential velocity components and higher amplitudes.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
1
3%
Other
3
10%
Unknown
7
23%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2012.
All research outputs
#31,219,024
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Conference proceedings Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
#1,445
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,867
of 252,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conference proceedings Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
#61
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
