↓ Skip to main content

Regulatory Reviews: Revolutionary Re-imagining of Charity Law or Simply Restatements of Convenience?

Overview of attention for article published in VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulatory Reviews: Revolutionary Re-imagining of Charity Law or Simply Restatements of Convenience?
Published in
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, April 2024
DOI 10.1007/s11266-024-00651-w
Authors

Oonagh B. Breen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,924,291
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
#630
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,339
of 169,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.