You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of HLA-A∗11:01, HLA-B∗39:01, and HLA-B∗56:03 with salazosulfapyridine-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.041 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koya Fukunaga, Eri Tsukagoshi, Ryosuke Nakamura, Kayoko Matsunaga, Takeshi Ozeki, Hideaki Watanabe, Akito Hasegawa, Natsumi Hama, Maiko Kurata, Yoshiko Mizukawa, Yuko Watanabe, Yukie Yamaguchi, Hiroyuki Niihara, Eishin Morita, Hideo Asada, Riichiro Abe, Yoshiro Saito, Taisei Mushiroda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 54% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,417,482
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#1,446
of 4,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,410
of 223,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.