↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evolution of Pectobacterium Bacteriophage ΦM1 To Escape Two Bifunctional Type III Toxin-Antitoxin and Abortive Infection Systems through Mutations in a Single Viral Gene
Published in
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1128/aem.03229-16
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Some bacteria, when infected by their viral parasites (bacteriophages), undergo a suicidal response that also terminates productive viral replication (abortive infection; Abi). This response can be viewed as an altruistic act protecting the uninfected bacterial clonal population. Abortive infection can occur through the action of Type III protein-RNA toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems, such as ToxINPa from the phytopathogen, Pectobacterium atrosepticum Rare spontaneous mutants evolved in the generalized transducing phage, ΦM1, which escaped ToxINPa-mediated abortive infection in P. atrosepticum ΦM1 is a member of the Podoviridae and member of the "KMV-like viruses", a subset of the T7 supergroup. Genomic sequencing of ΦM1 escape mutants revealed single-base changes which clustered in a single open reading frame. The "escape" gene product, M1-23, was highly toxic to the host bacterium when over-expressed, but mutations in M1-23 that enabled an escape phenotype caused M1-23 to be less toxic. M1-23 is encoded within the DNA metabolism modular section of the phage genome, and when it was over-expressed, it co-purified with the host nucleotide excision repair protein, UvrA. While the M1-23 protein interacted with UvrA in co-immunoprecipitation assays, a UvrA mutant strain still aborted ΦM1, suggesting that the interaction is not critical for the Type III TA Abi activity. Additionally, ΦM1 escaped a heterologous Type III TA system (TenpINPl) from Photorhabdus luminescens (reconstituted in P. atrosepticum) through mutations in the same protein, M1-23. The mechanistic action of M1-23 is currently unknown but further analysis of this protein could provide insights into the mode of activation of both systems. Bacteriophages, the viral predators of bacteria, are the most abundant biological entities and are important factors in driving bacterial evolution. In order to survive infection by these viruses, bacteria have evolved numerous anti-phage mechanisms. Many of the studies involved in understanding these interactions have led to the discovery of biotechnological and gene-editing tools, most notably restriction enzymes and more recently the CRISPR-Cas systems. Abortive infection is another such anti-phage mechanism that warrants further investigation. It is unique in that activation of the system leads to the premature death of the infected cells. As bacteria infected with the virus are destined to die, undergoing precocious suicide prevents the release of progeny phage and protects the rest of the bacterial population. This altruistic suicide can be caused by Type III toxin-antitoxin systems and understanding the activation mechanisms involved will provide deeper insight into the abortive infection process.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Neuroscience 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#16,157
of 19,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,239
of 323,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#67
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.