You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The consequences of the new European reclassification of non-invasive brain stimulation devices and the medical device regulations pose an existential threat to research and treatment: an invited opinion paper
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Neurophysiology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.03.039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Antal, Ana Ganho-Ávila, Sara Assecondi, Tracy Barbour, Jovana Bjekić, Daniel M Blumberger, Nadia Bolognini, Jerome Brunelin, Lorena Chanes, Matthew Dale, Raffaele Dubbioso, Giordano D'Urso, Igor Filipcic, Saša R Filipović, Marco Hirnstein, Femke Konings, Berthold Langguth, Letizia Leocani, Majid Memarian Sorkhabi, Marc Mulder, Mika Nikander, Rafal Nowak, Antonio Oliviero, Balder Onarheim, Jacinta O'Shea, Stefano Pallanti, Fady Rachid, Joana Rajão-Saraiva, Simone Rossi, Alexander T Sack, Anne Sauvaget, Rik van der Scheer, Klaus Schellhorn, Aureli Soria-Frisch, David Szekely, Hatice Tankisi, Paul Cj Taylor, Indira Tendolkar, Susanne Uusitalo, Chris Baeken |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 23% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| Germany | 3 | 10% |
| Belgium | 2 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 50% |
| Scientists | 14 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,803,560
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Neurophysiology
#124
of 5,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,394
of 274,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Neurophysiology
#2
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.