↓ Skip to main content

Using Focus Groups for Knowledge Sharing: Tracking Emerging Pandemic Impacts on USFS Wildland Fire Operations

Overview of attention for article published in Society & Natural Resources, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Focus Groups for Knowledge Sharing: Tracking Emerging Pandemic Impacts on USFS Wildland Fire Operations
Published in
Society & Natural Resources, April 2024
DOI 10.1080/08941920.2024.2341271
Authors

David Flores, Rebekah L. Fox, Jody Jahn, Craig Conley, Satoris S. Howes, Joel O. Iverson, Steven J. Venette, Emily R. Haire, Cathelijne R. Stoof

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,970,494
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Society & Natural Resources
#909
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,361
of 184,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Society & Natural Resources
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.