You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic Potential of Supplemental Static and Dynamic 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET for Primary 18F-FDG–Negative Pulmonary Lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2967/jnumed.123.267103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Röhrich, Johanna Daum, Ewgenija Gutjahr, Anna-Maria Spektor, Frederik M Glatting, Yasemin Aylin Sahin, Hans Georg Buchholz, Jorge Hoppner, Cathrin Schroeter, Eleni Mavriopoulou, Kai Schlamp, Matthias Grott, Florian Eichhorn, Claus Peter Heußel, Hans Ulrich Kauczor, Michael Kreuter, Frederik Giesel, Mathias Schreckenberger, Hauke Winter, Uwe Haberkorn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,910,013
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#421
of 4,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,658
of 191,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.