↓ Skip to main content

Dispersive optical detection of magnetic Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dispersive optical detection of magnetic Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases
Published in
Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, August 2017
DOI 10.1103/physreva.96.022705
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Magnetically tunable Feshbach resonances in ultracold atomic systems are chiefly identified and characterized through time-consuming atom loss spectroscopy. We describe an off-resonant dispersive optical probing technique to rapidly locate Feshbach resonances and demonstrate the method by locating four resonances of 87Rb, between the |F = 1,mF = 1〉 and |F = 2,mF = 0〉 states. Despite the loss features being ≲0.1 G wide, we require only 21 experimental runs to explore a magnetic field range >18 G, where 1G = 10-4 T. The resonances consist of two known s-wave features in the vicinity of 9 G and 18 G and two previously unreported p-wave features near 5G and 10 G. We further utilize the dispersive approach to directly characterize the two-body loss dynamics for each Feshbach resonance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Researcher 5 17%
Other 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 21 72%
Materials Science 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#22,487,215
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
#9,624
of 30,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,129
of 358,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
#122
of 584 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 584 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.