↓ Skip to main content

A Giant Sauropod Dinosaur from an Upper Cretaceous Mangrove Deposit in Egypt

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
81 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Giant Sauropod Dinosaur from an Upper Cretaceous Mangrove Deposit in Egypt
Published in
Science, June 2001
DOI 10.1126/science.1060561
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We describe a giant titanosaurid sauropod dinosaur discovered in coastal deposits in the Upper Cretaceous Bahariya Formation of Egypt, a unit that has produced three Tyrannosaurus-sized theropods and numerous other vertebrate taxa. Paralititan stromeri is the first tetrapod reported from Bahariya since 1935. Its 1.69-meter-long humerus is longer than that of any known Cretaceous sauropod. The autochthonous scavenged skeleton was preserved in mangrove deposits, raising the possibility that titanosaurids and their predators habitually entered such environments.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Argentina 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Colombia 2 1%
Chile 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 133 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 23%
Researcher 35 23%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 66 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 34%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Linguistics 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2026.
All research outputs
#697,836
of 31,814,824 outputs
Outputs from Science
#14,825
of 91,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#409
of 56,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#17
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,814,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.