↓ Skip to main content

Needs and Preferences for the Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence Among Hispanics: A Community’s Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Prevention, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Needs and Preferences for the Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence Among Hispanics: A Community’s Perspective
Published in
Journal of Prevention, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10935-013-0312-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Research suggest that Hispanics in the U.S. are disproportionately affected by the consequences of intimate partner violence. Nevertheless, few intimate partner violence prevention interventions have been developed to address the unique needs and preferences of this population. The Partnership for Domestic Violence Prevention is a community-based participatory research project that assessed the needs and preferences for prevention programs for Hispanics in Miami-Dade County. Nine focus groups with domestic violence service providers, victims and general community members were conducted (N = 76). Four major themes emerged from the focus groups. These included immigrants and teens as the highest priority groups to target in prevention efforts, culture as a double-edged sword, the system that helps and hurts the victim, and the need for wide-scale prevention programs that would reach Hispanics systematically. The results from this study have important implications for the development of intimate violence prevention interventions targeting Hispanics in the U.S.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 128 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 44 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Social Sciences 18 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 46 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2013.
All research outputs
#28,811,852
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Prevention
#468
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,475
of 240,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Prevention
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.