You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Isolation and genetic characterization of multiple genotypes of both H5 and H7 avian influenza viruses from environmental water in the Izumi plain, Kagoshima prefecture, Japan during the 2021/22 winter season
|
---|---|
Published in |
Comparative Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cimid.2024.102182 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kosuke Okuya, Mana Esaki, Kaori Tokorozaki, Taichi Hasegawa, Makoto Ozawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 12% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 88% |
Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,487,094
of 26,032,395 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#13
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,564
of 316,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,032,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.