You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rural healthcare access and supply constraints: A causal analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Southern Economic Journal, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/soej.12686 |
Authors |
Vitor Melo, Liam Sigaud, Elijah Neilson, Markus Bjoerkheim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 50 | 68% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 59 | 81% |
Scientists | 9 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#579,493
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Southern Economic Journal
#16
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,166
of 210,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Southern Economic Journal
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them