↓ Skip to main content

Simulation-Based Power Analyses for the Smallest Effect Size of Interest: A Confidence-Interval Approach for Minimum-Effect and Equivalence Testing

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simulation-Based Power Analyses for the Smallest Effect Size of Interest: A Confidence-Interval Approach for Minimum-Effect and Equivalence Testing
Published in
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, April 2024
DOI 10.1177/25152459241240722
Authors

Paul Riesthuis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,005,113
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
#139
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,195
of 167,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.