You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of supplementing cassava root silage to grazing dairy cows on nutrient utilization, milk production and composition in the tropics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tropical Animal Health and Production, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11250-024-03962-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luckas Thiago Oliveira Galvão, Julián Andrés Castillo Vargas, Rafael Mezzomo, Luis Rennan Sampaio Oliveira, Perlon Maia dos Santos, Raylon Pereira Maciel, Emilly Araújo Soares, Maria Luiza Costa Farias, Cláudia Siqueira Caldas, Antonio Pinheiro Faciola, Kaliandra Souza Alves |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,832,228
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#547
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,803
of 171,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them