You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Precision Sports Science: What Is Next for Data Analytics for Athlete Performance and Well-Being Optimization?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Sciences, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3390/app14083361 |
Authors |
Juliana Exel, Peter Dabnichki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 33% |
Belgium | 1 | 33% |
Austria | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,830,228
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Applied Sciences
#2,631
of 15,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,161
of 144,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Sciences
#16
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.