↓ Skip to main content

Minimal important clinical difference values are not uniformly valid in the active duty military population recovering from shoulder surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Minimal important clinical difference values are not uniformly valid in the active duty military population recovering from shoulder surgery
Published in
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, April 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Sheean, Matthew S. Tenan, Mikalyn T. DeFoor, Daniel J. Cognetti, Asheesh Bedi, Albert Lin, Travis J. Dekker, MOTION Collaborative, Ivan J. Antosh, James Bailey, Brian T. Barlow, Craig R. Bottoni, Matthew W. Bradley, Kenneth L. Cameron, William E. Daner, Travis Dekker, Jonathan F. Dickens, Michael A. Donohue, Joseph W. Galvin, Estephan J. Garcia, Shawn Gee, Chad A. Haley, Andrew P. Hurvitz, Kelly Kilcoyne, Joseph T. Lanzi, Lance LeClere, Ian E. Lee, Lucas S. McDonald, Kyong S. Min, Brett D. Owens, Mark Pallis, Jeanne C. Patzkowski, Matthew Posner, Benjamin K. Potter, Matthew T. Provencher, Daniel Rhon, Christopher J. Roach, Richard Judd Robins, Marina J. Rodriguez, Matthew R. Schmitz, Mark Slabaugh, Andrew J. Sheean, Jennifer L. Smith, Daniel J. Song, David T. Streets, David Tennent, John M. Tokish, Christopher J. Tucker, Scott C. Wagner, Robert Waltz, Matthew S. Tenan, William R. Volk, Jonathan F. Dickens

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,487,715
of 28,241,322 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
#982
of 3,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,414
of 349,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,241,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.