↓ Skip to main content

Don't be a nocebo! Why healthcare organizations should value patients' expectations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
103 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Don't be a nocebo! Why healthcare organizations should value patients' expectations
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1393179
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Poulter, Maxi Miciak, Jerry Durham, Alvisa Palese, Giacomo Rossettini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#741,829
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,551
of 34,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,285
of 253,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#6
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.