You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospective, multi-centre, head-to-head comparison between allergists vs non-allergists in low-risk penicillin allergy delabelling: effectiveness, safety and quality of life (HK-DADI2)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.04.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane CY. Wong, Andy KC. Kan, Thomas SH. Chik, M.Y. Chu, Timothy CM. Li, Hugo WF. Mak, Valerie Chiang, Philip H. Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,380,432
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#645
of 4,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,745
of 201,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.