You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pain during primary molar local anaesthesia with SleeperOne5 computerized device versus conventional syringe: A randomized, split‐mouth, crossover, controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ipd.13189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michèle Muller‐Bolla, Elody Aïem, Clara Joseph, Tiphaine Davit‐Béal, Thomas Marquillier, Emmanuelle Esclassan, Caroline Delfosse, Serena Lopez, Ana Miriam Velly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 67% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,302,882
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
#369
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,397
of 154,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.